Watson v. City of Henderson

District Court, D. Nevada·Decided January 7, 2022·No. 2:20-cv-01761·Unknown

Opinion

Patrick G. Byrne, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 7636 Richard C. Gordon, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 9036 Paul Swenson Prior, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 9324 Christian P. Ogata, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 15612 3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100 Las Vegas, NV 89169 Telephone: (702) 784-5200 Facsimile: (702) 784-5252 Email: pbyrne@swlaw.com rgordon@swlaw.com sprior@swlaw.com cogata@swlaw.com

Attorneys for Defendants City of Henderson, Richard Derrick, Bristol Ellington, Nicholas Vaskov, and Kristina Escamilla Gilmore UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

LATESHA WATSON, Case No.: 2:20-cv-01761-APG-BNW Plaintiff

v. [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER CITY OF HENDERSON et al.,

Defendants Plaintiff LaTesha Watson and Defendants City of Henderson, Richard Derrick, Bristol Ellington, Nicholas Vaskov, Kristina Gilmore, Kenneth Kerby, Kevin Abernathy, and Richard McCann (collectively the “Parties” and each individually a “Party”), stipulate, upon approval by this Court, that this protective order shall govern the handling and disclosure of all documents, testimony, or other information produced or given in this case (the “Litigation”) that is designated as subject to this order and its terms. A. Definitions 1. A “Producing Party” is any Party or non-party that produces or discloses confidential documents, materials, items, or other information under the terms if this protective order. 2. A “Receiving Party” is any Party or non-party that receives or is given access to confidential documents, materials, items, or other information under the terms of this protective order. 3. “Discovery Material” refers to all items or information, regardless of the medium or manner generated, stored, or maintained, including documents, testimony, interrogatory responses, transcripts, depositions and deposition exhibits, responses to requests for admission, recorded or graphic matter, electronically stored information, tangible things, and/or other information produced, given, exchanged by, or obtained from any Producing Party during discovery in this action. 4. An “Authorized Recipient” is any person or entity authorized by this protective order to obtain access to Confidential Information. 5. When interpreting this protective order, the term “and” includes the term “or” and the term “or” includes the term “and.” 6. Paragraph headings are for convenience only and in no way limit or enlarge the scope or meaning of this order. B. Purposes and limitations Discovery in this Litigation may involve the use, production, and disclosure of Discovery Material containing confidential, financial, proprietary, sensitive, personal, and/or private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose— other than in prosecuting, defending, settling, or otherwise in this Litigation, including any appeals, and/or for enforcing and/or collecting any judgment entered in this Litigation—would be warranted and consistent with the public policy of United States and the State of Nevada. The use, production, and/or disclosure of Protected Material could severely injure or damage the Parties given the sensitive and confidential nature of the information and if accomplished in a manner or means inconsistent with this Protective Order. Similarly, the use, production, or disclosure of Protected Material involving private information of non-parties could severely injure or damage those non- parties. Therefore, in the interest of expediting and facilitating discovery, permitting the same to proceed without delay created by possible disputes regarding claims of confidentiality, and balancing the interests of the Parties, this protective order establishes a procedure for producing, disclosing, and using Protected Material without involving the Court unnecessarily in the process; imposes obligations upon all Parties, persons, and non-parties receiving or given access to Protected Material to protect it from unauthorized production, disclosure, and/or use; and establishes a procedure for challenging the use, disclosure, or dissemination of Protected Material. C. Protected material “Protected Material” is any Discovery Material that is designated as “Confidential” or “Restricted – Attorneys’ Eyes Only Material,” provided, however, that “Protected Material” does not include information that is publicly available (except information that became publicly available as a result of a breach of this protective order or any other confidentiality agreement or undertaking). Subject to the provisions herein and unless otherwise stated, this protective order governs, without limitation: (a) all documents, electronically stored information, and/or things as defined by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; (b) all pretrial, hearing or deposition testimony, or documents marked as exhibits or for identification in depositions and hearings; (c) all pretrial pleadings, exhibits to pleadings and other court filings; (d) all affidavits; and (e) all stipulations. All copies, reproductions, extracts, digests and complete or partial summaries prepared from any Protected Material shall also be considered Protected Material and treated as such under this Protective Order. Any Party may designate for protection under this protective order, in whole or in part, any document, information or other material that constitutes or includes confidential or proprietary information or trade secrets according to the terms below. 1. Designation of Protected Material a. “Confidential Material.” Any Party may, subject to the provisions of this protective order, designate as “CONFIDENTIAL” any Discovery Material that the Party believes in good faith is confidential and where the Party would not normally reveal the information to third parties except in confidence or has undertaken with others to maintain it in confidence (“Confidential Material”). b. “Restricted—Attorneys’ Eyes Only.” Any party may, subject to the provisions of this protective order, designate as “RESTRICTED— ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” any Discovery Material that meets the requirements for Confidential Material, and that a Producing Party believes in good faith would likely cause competitive, or financial injury if disclosed (“Restricted – Attorneys’ Eyes Only Material”). This designation is intended for information that constitutes highly confidential information, including, but not limited to (i) sensitive information about current and former employees, (ii) confidential reports, (iii) ongoing investigations, or (iv) any other Discovery Material that qualifies for protection under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c). 2. Objection to designations If any Party disagrees at any point in the Litigation with any designation made under this protective order, a Party may object to any designation of material as Protected Material. The Parties shall first try to resolve such dispute in good faith on an informal basis in accordance with Local Rule 26-6. If the dispute cannot be resolved, the objecting Party may seek appropriate relief from the Court. The Party asserting that Discovery Material should be designated as Protected Material bears the burden of proof to establish that the information is entitled to such protection. During the pendency of any challenge to the designation of a document or information, the designated document or information shall continue to be treated as Confidential Material subject to the provisions of this protective order. For the avoidance of doubt, a Party may object at any time to any designation of material as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “RESTRICTED – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” D. Use of protected material 1. Generally The Parties, and the law firms appearing as their counsel in this Litigation, may make such use of the Protected Ma

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Watson v. City of Henderson, (D. Nev. 2022).

Watson v. City of Henderson (Watson v. City of Henderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.