Watson v. Circuit Court

Fourth Circuit

Watson v. Circuit Court

224 F. App'x 304

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 25, 2007·No. No. 07-6235·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Travis Watson appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Watson v. Circuit Court, No. 2:07-cv-00044-RAJ (E.D.Va. Feb. 5, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Travis Watson appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Watson v. Circuit Court, No. 2:07-cv-00044-RAJ (E.D.Va. Feb. 5, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Watson v. Circuit Court, 224 F. App'x 304 (4th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

224 F. App'x 304 (Watson v. Circuit Court) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related