Watson v. Chicago Building Construction Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Watson v. Chicago Building Construction Co.

209 Ill. App. 434

Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided January 31, 1918·No. Gen. No. 23,203·Published

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice Barnes

delivered the opinion of the court.

Abstract of the Decision. 1. Municipal Court op Chicago, § 26*—what is not statement of facts. A mere recitation of testimony is not a statement of facts though certified as such. 2. Contracts, § 384*—when shown that agreement completed before reduced to writing. In an action to recover for services claimed to have been rendered under a contract, evidence held to support a finding that the agreement was completed before it was put into writing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Presiding Justice Barnes

delivered the opinion of the court.

Abstract of the Decision. 1. Municipal Court op Chicago, § 26*—what is not statement of facts. A mere recitation of testimony is not a statement of facts though certified as such. 2. Contracts, § 384*—when shown that agreement completed before reduced to writing. In an action to recover for services claimed to have been rendered under a contract, evidence held to support a finding that the agreement was completed before it was put into writing.

Watson v. Chicago Building Construction Co., 209 Ill. App. 434 (Ill. Ct. App. 1918).

Pincite

209 Ill. App. 434 (Watson v. Chicago Building Construction Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.