Watson v. Charleston Stevedoring Co.
139 S.E. 778, 141 S.C. 355, 1927 S.C. LEXIS 81
Opinion
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
The order of his Honor, Judge Bonham, granting a non-suit in this case, is entirely satisfactory, and for the reasons stated by him is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Watson v. Charleston Stevedoring Co., 139 S.E. 778, 141 S.C. 355, 1927 S.C. LEXIS 81 (S.C. 1927).
139 S.E. 778 (Watson v. Charleston Stevedoring Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Carter v. JORDAN OIL CO., INC.
365 S.E.2d 324 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1988)
Hicklin v. Jeff Hunt MacHinery Co.
85 S.E.2d 739 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1955)
Barnwell v. ELLIOTT
80 S.E.2d 748 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1954)
Mahon v. Spartanburg County
32 S.E.2d 368 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1944)
Montgomery v. Conway Lumber Co.
172 S.E. 620 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1934)
Weston v. Hillyer
159 S.E. 390 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1931)
Jackson v. Brock
159 S.E. 22 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1931)
Hopkins v. Southern Cotton Oil Co.
142 S.E. 615 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1928)