Watson v. Burnley

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Watson v. Burnley

105 S.E. 42, 25 Ga. App. 779, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 210

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedNovember 10, 1920

Docket10507

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 105 S.E. 42 (Watson v. Burnley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Watson v. Burnley, 105 S.E. 42, 25 Ga. App. 779, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 210 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).

Pincite

Opinion

Smith, J.

In accordance with the rules of law governing this case, as set forth by the Supreme Court in response to questions certified to it by this court (Watson v. Burnley, 150 Ga. 460, 104 S. E. 220), the judgment of the court below overruling the demurrer .to the petition is Affirmed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur. Sam. L. Olive, J. Glenn Stovall, for plaintiff in error. J. B. Burnside, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith, J.

In accordance with the rules of law governing this case, as set forth by the Supreme Court in response to questions certified to it by this court (Watson v. Burnley, 150 Ga. 460, 104 S. E. 220), the judgment of the court below overruling the demurrer .to the petition is Affirmed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur. Sam. L. Olive, J. Glenn Stovall, for plaintiff in error. J. B. Burnside, contra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

105 S.E. 42, 25 Ga. App. 779, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 210, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/watson-v-burnley-gactapp-1920.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack