Watson v. Barksdale

264 S.E.2d 30, 152 Ga. App. 645, 1979 Ga. App. LEXIS 2991
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided December 3, 1979·No. 58155·Published

Opinion

Underwood, Judge.

This injunction case was transferred here by the Supreme Court. Since appellee has not made an appearance to contest appellant’s statement of the case, that statement will be taken as true and will serve as the basis upon which we decide the case. Rule 15 (b) (1), Rules of the Supreme Court and Court of Appeals (Code Ann. § 24-3615 (b) (1)); Veal v. Riner, 214 Ga. 539 (106 SE2d 26) (1958); Cincinnati N. O. &c. R. Co. v. Hilley, 121 Ga. App. 196 (1) (173 SE2d 242) (1970). Since it appears under appellant’s statement that the grant of the injunction was erroneous, the judgment will be reversed.

Judgment reversed.

McMurray, P. J., and Banke, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Watson v. Barksdale, 264 S.E.2d 30, 152 Ga. App. 645, 1979 Ga. App. LEXIS 2991 (Ga. Ct. App. 1979).

264 S.E.2d 30 (Watson v. Barksdale) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

CINCINNATI, NO &C. R. CO. v. Hilley
173 S.E.2d 242 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1970)
Veal v. Riner
106 S.E.2d 26 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1958)