Watson v. Barksdale
This text of 264 S.E.2d 30 (Watson v. Barksdale) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This injunction case was transferred here by the Supreme Court. Since appellee has not made an appearance to contest appellant’s statement of the case, that statement will be taken as true and will serve as the basis upon which we decide the case. Rule 15 (b) (1), Rules of the Supreme Court and Court of Appeals (Code Ann. § 24-3615 (b) (1)); Veal v. Riner, 214 Ga. 539 (106 SE2d 26) (1958); Cincinnati N. O. &c. R. Co. v. Hilley, 121 Ga. App. 196 (1) (173 SE2d 242) (1970). Since it appears under appellant’s statement that the grant of the injunction was erroneous, the judgment will be reversed.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
264 S.E.2d 30, 152 Ga. App. 645, 1979 Ga. App. LEXIS 2991, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/watson-v-barksdale-gactapp-1979.