Watson v. Alberts
79 N.W. 1048, 120 Mich. 508, 1899 Mich. LEXIS 978
Opinion
(after stating the facts). The property was sold to be attached to the distillery, and plaintiffs so understood it. It was so attached, and was sold by Minnick, as a part of the realty, to defendants, who were bona fide purchasers. The case is ruled by Wickes Bros. v. Hill, 115 Mich. 333.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Watson v. Alberts, 79 N.W. 1048, 120 Mich. 508, 1899 Mich. LEXIS 978 (Mich. 1899).
79 N.W. 1048 (Watson v. Alberts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Wood Hydraulic Hoist & Body Co. v. Norton
257 N.W. 836 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1934)
Lasch v. Columbus Heating & Ventilating Co.
163 S.E. 486 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1932)
Triumph Electric Co. v. Patterson
211 F. 244 (Eighth Circuit, 1914)
Detroit Trust Co. v. Detroit, Flint & Saginaw Railway
124 N.W. 45 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1909)