Watson, Tavaris Lashawn AKA Watson, Tavaris L.

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 9, 2013
DocketWR-75,170-03
StatusPublished

This text of Watson, Tavaris Lashawn AKA Watson, Tavaris L. (Watson, Tavaris Lashawn AKA Watson, Tavaris L.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Watson, Tavaris Lashawn AKA Watson, Tavaris L., (Tex. 2013).

Opinion





IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS



NO. WR-75,170-03
EX PARTE TAVARIS LASHAWN WATSON, Applicant


ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. F-07-74074-Q IN THE 204TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM DALLAS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R



Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of aggravated robbery and sentenced to twenty years' imprisonment. He did not appeal his conviction.

Applicant contends, among other things, that trial counsel advised him that if he insisted on a trial, he would be found guilty and sentenced to life. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Patterson, 993 S.W.2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court shall order counsel to respond to Applicant's claim and state whether he gave such advice to Applicant. The trial court may use any means set out in Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.07, § 3(d).

If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent him at the hearing. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 26.04.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether counsel's conduct was deficient and, if so, whether Applicant would have insisted on a trial but for this deficient conduct. Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52 (1985). The trial court shall also direct the District Clerk to forward page 8 of the 11.07 form, if filed by Applicant. The trial court shall make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant's claim for habeas corpus relief.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter's notes from any hearing or deposition, along with the trial court's supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall be obtained from this Court.



Filed: January 9, 2013

Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Strickland v. Washington
466 U.S. 668 (Supreme Court, 1984)
Hill v. Lockhart
474 U.S. 52 (Supreme Court, 1985)
Ex Parte Rodriguez
334 S.W.2d 294 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1960)
Ex Parte Patterson
993 S.W.2d 114 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1999)
Ex Parte Young
418 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Watson, Tavaris Lashawn AKA Watson, Tavaris L., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/watson-tavaris-lashawn-aka-watson-tavaris-l-texcrimapp-2013.