Watson Fireproof Window Co. v. Miller

Appellate Court of Illinois

Watson Fireproof Window Co. v. Miller

194 Ill. App. 316, 1915 Ill. App. LEXIS 485

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedJune 17, 1915

DocketGen. No. 20,356

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 194 Ill. App. 316 (Watson Fireproof Window Co. v. Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Watson Fireproof Window Co. v. Miller, 194 Ill. App. 316, 1915 Ill. App. LEXIS 485 (Ill. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice Fitch

delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Patents, § 29*—violation 6y licensor of agreement to prosecute infringers. The evidence in an action to recover royalties upon the manufacture of a patented article, held not to show a violation of the licensor’s agreement to vigorously prosecute infringers. 3. Patents, § 29*—granting licenses to another on more favorable terms in violation of agreement. The granting of licenses to manufacture a patented article on more favorable terms than those given the defendant, in violation of the terms of his license, held no defense to an action for royalties, where such licenses were granted with his knowledge and consent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Presiding Justice Fitch

delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Patents, § 29*—violation 6y licensor of agreement to prosecute infringers. The evidence in an action to recover royalties upon the manufacture of a patented article, held not to show a violation of the licensor’s agreement to vigorously prosecute infringers. 3. Patents, § 29*—granting licenses to another on more favorable terms in violation of agreement. The granting of licenses to manufacture a patented article on more favorable terms than those given the defendant, in violation of the terms of his license, held no defense to an action for royalties, where such licenses were granted with his knowledge and consent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

194 Ill. App. 316, 1915 Ill. App. LEXIS 485, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/watson-fireproof-window-co-v-miller-illappct-1915.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack