Watson ex rel. Watson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
This text of 639 So. 2d 687 (Watson ex rel. Watson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The final judgment in this action for the appellee, defendant below, states that the appellee “shall recover attorneys fees and taxable costs from Plaintiff, HEATHER WATSON, by and through ROBERT WATSON, her father, in the sum of $22,163.50, which shall bear interest at the rate of 12% per annum and for which sum let execution issue.”
Heather Watson had reached her majority at the time the final judgment was entered. On this appeal she argues that the provision in the final judgment for recovery of attorney’s fees and taxable costs should make it clear that the award is against only Heather Watson and not her father.
When a minor is represented by a parent as “next friend,” the “next friend” is not a party to the action; the real party in interest is the minor. Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.210(b); Youngblood v. Taylor, 89 So.2d 503 (Fla.1956); Brown v. Caldwell, 389 So.2d 287 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980).
We believe that the final judgment is correctly worded, but affirm with the clarification that the appellee is entitled to recover attorney’s fees and taxable costs from only the plaintiff Heather Watson and not from her father.
Affirmed as clarified.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
639 So. 2d 687, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 6644, 1994 WL 321654, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/watson-ex-rel-watson-v-state-farm-mutual-automobile-insurance-co-fladistctapp-1994.