Watson Boulevard Apartments, Inc. v. Huffcut

23 A.D.2d 508, 255 N.Y.S.2d 184, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5114
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 5, 1965·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Memorandum By The Court. Petitioners appeal from an order and judgment of the Supreme Court at Special Term dismissing their proceeding to review assessments of real property. As pertinent here, subdivision 1 of section 708 of the Real Property Tax Law provides: “ If the assessment to be reviewed was made by the assessors of an assessing unit, service shall be made by delivering three copies of the petition and notice to the clerk of such assessing unit”. It is conceded that service as thus provided was not effected. The failure to suffice the statute’s condition precedent is jurisdictionally fatal to the review sought. (Matter of Onteora Club v. Board of Assessors, 17 A D 2d 1008, uffid. 13 N Y 2d 1170.) Judgment and order affirmed, without costs. Herlihy, J. P., Reynolds, Taylor, Aulisi and Hamm, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Watson Boulevard Apartments, Inc. v. Huffcut, 23 A.D.2d 508, 255 N.Y.S.2d 184, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5114 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1965).

23 A.D.2d 508 (Watson Boulevard Apartments, Inc. v. Huffcut) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wyeth Ayerst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Assessor of the Town of Champlain
24 A.D.3d 849 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Barron v. Town of Esopus
246 A.D.2d 707 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Allen v. Board of Assessors
57 A.D.2d 1036 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)
Rodriguez v. Board of Assessors
53 A.D.2d 788 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)