Watmuff v. Perini

249 N.E.2d 887, 19 Ohio St. 2d 163, 48 Ohio Op. 2d 197, 1969 Ohio LEXIS 350
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 30, 1969
DocketNo. 69-209
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 249 N.E.2d 887 (Watmuff v. Perini) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Watmuff v. Perini, 249 N.E.2d 887, 19 Ohio St. 2d 163, 48 Ohio Op. 2d 197, 1969 Ohio LEXIS 350 (Ohio 1969).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is an action in habeas corpus originating in this court.

Pursuant to a plea of guilty, petitioner, on March 13, 1963, was sentenced to a term of two to seven years for malicious entry and aggravated assault.

Petitioner does not attack the validity of his conviction or his sentence. His only contention is that his sentence began to run on the day it was imposed rather than some four days later when he was received at the penal institution.

Ordinarily, a sentence begins to run when the convicted person is delivered to the penal institution. 24B Corpus Juris Secundum. 634, Criminal Law, Section 1995(2).

Petitioner remanded to custody.

Taft, C. J., Matthias, O’Neill, Schneider, Herbert and Duncan, JJ., concur.*

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Edwards
515 N.E.2d 643 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
249 N.E.2d 887, 19 Ohio St. 2d 163, 48 Ohio Op. 2d 197, 1969 Ohio LEXIS 350, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/watmuff-v-perini-ohio-1969.