Watlington v. Alvarez
This text of Watlington v. Alvarez (Watlington v. Alvarez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-6552
JAMES THOMAS WATLINGTON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
VILLANGEVA ALVAREZ; MAJOR LYCETT; CINDY HORNE, Counselor,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (CA-02-272-AM)
Submitted: May 30, 2002 Decided: June 10, 2002
Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Thomas Watlington, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
James Thomas Watlington appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001)
complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s
opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the
reasoning of the district court. Watlington v. Alvarez, No. CA-02-
272-AM (E.D. Va. Mar. 12, 2002). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Watlington v. Alvarez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/watlington-v-alvarez-ca4-2002.