Watkins v. Weaver

4 Ark. 556
Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided July 15, 1842·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

By the Court,

Dickinson, J.

The suit is instituted upon a writing obligatory, dated at Little Rock. The defendant below craved oyer, and demurred, upon the ground of’misdescription in the declaration. It states that it was executed at the county of Pulaski. This, we deem sufficient; for it is an averment as to the place alone, not a description of the writing sued on. The obligation is,payable one day after date, with interest at the rate of eight per cent, per annum. The breach'conforms to the stipulations of the contract; and, in our opinion, there is no error in the judgment of the court below, in overruling the demurrer.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Watkins v. Weaver, 4 Ark. 556 (Ark. 1842).

4 Ark. 556 (Watkins v. Weaver) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rector v. Taylor, Gardiner & Co.
7 Ark. 128 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1851)