Watkins v. Ætna Life Insurance

201 N.C. 681
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided November 18, 1931·Published

Opinion

Pee CuRiam.

The contract of insurance issued by the defendant to Pomona Mills, Inc., under which, plaintiff claims, was not offered in evidence. Nor does it appear that it was in force when plaintiff’s intestate left the Pomona Mills or when he died. The judgment of nonsuit was properly entered.

The order made by the judge allowing defendant to file answer, after statutory time for filing had expired, is supported by the decision in Howard v. Hinson, 191 N. C., 366, 131 S. E., 748.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Watkins v. Ætna Life Insurance, 201 N.C. 681 (N.C. 1931).

201 N.C. 681 (Watkins v. Ætna Life Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Howard v. . Hinson
131 S.E. 748 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1926)