Watkins v. Stevens
3 How. Pr. 28
This text of 3 How. Pr. 28 (Watkins v. Stevens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Watkins v. Stevens, 3 How. Pr. 28 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1847).
Opinion
Granted the motion, (no costs to either party,) on the ground that the Plaintiffs’ attorney should have endorsed his residence on the narr served, he was irregular in that respect, but did not think the Defendant had used due diligence in ascertaining the residence ; therefore no costs were allowed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Gribbon v. . Freel
93 N.Y. 93 (New York Court of Appeals, 1883)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
3 How. Pr. 28, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/watkins-v-stevens-nysupct-1847.