Watkins v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Watkins v. State

989 S.W.2d 959, 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 581, 1999 WL 268417

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 4, 1999·No. No. 74894·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant Earl Watkins appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion without a hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court’s determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant Earl Watkins appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion without a hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court’s determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Watkins v. State, 989 S.W.2d 959, 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 581, 1999 WL 268417 (Mo. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

989 S.W.2d 959 (Watkins v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.