Watkins v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Watkins v. State

895 S.W.2d 162, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 232, 1995 WL 45871

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 7, 1995·No. No. 65918·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from his motion court’s denial, without evidentiary hearing, of mov-ant’s Rule 24.035 motion to vacate his Alford plea of guilty to first degree burglary. The motion court made complete findings of fact and conclusions of law that the allegations of the motion were refuted by the record. Those findings of fact are not clearly erroneous and no error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MEMORANDUM

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from his motion court’s denial, without evidentiary hearing, of mov-ant’s Rule 24.035 motion to vacate his Alford plea of guilty to first degree burglary. The motion court made complete findings of fact and conclusions of law that the allegations of the motion were refuted by the record. Those findings of fact are not clearly erroneous and no error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Watkins v. State, 895 S.W.2d 162, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 232, 1995 WL 45871 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

895 S.W.2d 162 (Watkins v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.