Watkins v. State

114 S.E. 915, 29 Ga. App. 320, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 276
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided December 13, 1922·No. 14014·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Luke, J.

A certificate to a bill of exceptions, wherein the judge certifies that it is true and correct “except the third assignment of error; motion was submitted by counsel for defendant and State,” does not amount to a certification that the bill of exceptions as written is true; and the writ of error must be dismissed. Love v. Love, 146 Ga. 161, 162 (91 S. E. 27), and authorities cited.

Writ of error dismissed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur. J. 8. James, for plaintiff in error. J. B. Hutcheson, solicitor-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Watkins v. State, 114 S.E. 915, 29 Ga. App. 320, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 276 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

114 S.E. 915 (Watkins v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bowman v. State
85 S.E.2d 66 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1954)
Keough v. Georgia Power Co.
149 S.E. 435 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1929)