Watkins v. State
858 So. 2d 346, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 16114, 2003 WL 22432817
Opinion
We affirm the trial court’s denial of the appellant’s motion to correct illegal sentence. See Pitts v. State, 855 So.2d 681(Fla. 1st DCA 2003); State v. Franklin, 836 So.2d 1112 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003). We certify conflict with Taylor v. State, 818 So.2d 544 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002), review dismissed, 821 So.2d 302 (Fla.2002).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Watkins v. State, 858 So. 2d 346, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 16114, 2003 WL 22432817 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).
858 So. 2d 346 (Watkins v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Taylor v. State
818 So. 2d 544 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
State v. Franklin
836 So. 2d 1112 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Pitts v. State
855 So. 2d 681 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)