Watkins v. South Carolina
418 U.S. 911, 94 S. Ct. 3204
Opinions
Appeal from Sup. Ct. S. C. dismissed for want of substantial federal question. Mr. Justice Douglas, being of the view that any state ban on obscenity is prohibited by the First [912]*912Amendment, made applicable to the States by the Fourteenth (see Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, 413 U. S. 49, 70 (1973) (Douglas, J., dissenting)), would note jurisdiction and reverse the judgment.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Watkins v. South Carolina, 418 U.S. 911, 94 S. Ct. 3204 (1974).
418 U.S. 911 (Watkins v. South Carolina) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Commonwealth v. Rodgers
327 A.2d 118 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1974)