Watkins v. Prack
52 N.E.3d 243, 27 N.Y.3d 1017, 32 N.Y.S.3d 578, 2016 NY Slip Op 72268, 2016 WL 1740292, 2016 N.Y. LEXIS 1051
Opinion
[1018] Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division judgment, dismissed as untimely (see CPLR 5513 [b]; Eaton v State of New York, 76 NY2d 824 [1990]); motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order denying reargument, dismissed upon the ground that such order does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Watkins v. Prack, 52 N.E.3d 243, 27 N.Y.3d 1017, 32 N.Y.S.3d 578, 2016 NY Slip Op 72268, 2016 WL 1740292, 2016 N.Y. LEXIS 1051 (N.Y. 2016).
52 N.E.3d 243 (Watkins v. Prack) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Eaton v. State
559 N.E.2d 675 (New York Court of Appeals, 1990)