Watkins v. Pintard
1 N.J.L. 378
Opinion
The counsel for the plaintiff argued to the jury that from the defendant’s not producing this book they were entitled t© infer that it would, if laid before them have proved a loans but the court said no such inferexice could legally be draw© without notice to produce it.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Watkins v. Pintard, 1 N.J.L. 378 (N.J. 1795).
1 N.J.L. 378 (Watkins v. Pintard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bree v. Jalbert
209 A.2d 836 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1965)