Watkins v. Noel

137 So. 523, 102 Fla. 1041
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided September 29, 1931·Published

Opinion

Whitfield, P.J.

— The final order remanding the petitioner in habeas corpus proceedings brought here on writ of error is reversed upon the principles announced in Roach v. Ephren, 82 Fla. 523, 90 So. 609; Dusenburg v. Chesney, 97 Fla. 468, 121 So. 567; 37 C. J. 200, sec. 53. This ease is in principle clearly unlike Penin. Cas. Co. v. State, 68 Fla. 411, 67 So. 165.

Reversed.

Terrell and Davis, J.J., concur. Buford, C.J., and Ellis and Brown, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Watkins v. Noel, 137 So. 523, 102 Fla. 1041 (Fla. 1931).

137 So. 523 (Watkins v. Noel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dusenbury v. Chesney
121 So. 567 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1929)
Peninsular Casualty Co. v. State
68 Fla. 411 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1914)
Roach v. Ephren
90 So. 609 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1921)