Watkins v. Noel

Supreme Court of Florida

Watkins v. Noel

137 So. 523, 102 Fla. 1041

DecidedSeptember 29, 1931

StatusPublished

This text of 137 So. 523 (Watkins v. Noel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Watkins v. Noel, 137 So. 523, 102 Fla. 1041 (Fla. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

Whitfield, P.J.

— The final order remanding the petitioner in habeas corpus proceedings brought here on writ of error is reversed upon the principles announced in Roach v. Ephren, 82 Fla. 523, 90 So. 609; Dusenburg v. Chesney, 97 Fla. 468, 121 So. 567; 37 C. J. 200, sec. 53. This ease is in principle clearly unlike Penin. Cas. Co. v. State, 68 Fla. 411, 67 So. 165.

Reversed.

Terrell and Davis, J.J., concur. Buford, C.J., and Ellis and Brown, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Whitfield, P.J.

— The final order remanding the petitioner in habeas corpus proceedings brought here on writ of error is reversed upon the principles announced in Roach v. Ephren, 82 Fla. 523, 90 So. 609; Dusenburg v. Chesney, 97 Fla. 468, 121 So. 567; 37 C. J. 200, sec. 53. This ease is in principle clearly unlike Penin. Cas. Co. v. State, 68 Fla. 411, 67 So. 165.

Reversed.

Terrell and Davis, J.J., concur. Buford, C.J., and Ellis and Brown, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

137 So. 523, 102 Fla. 1041, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/watkins-v-noel-fla-1931.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack