Watkins v. Mathis

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Watkins v. Mathis

112 S.E. 914, 28 Ga. App. 693, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 788

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJune 14, 1922

Docket13001

StatusPublished

This text of 112 S.E. 914 (Watkins v. Mathis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Watkins v. Mathis, 112 S.E. 914, 28 Ga. App. 693, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 788 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

Pincite

Opinion

Jenkins, P. J.

The hundred dollars alleged to have been expended for the defendant, at his instance and by his request, in the purchase of a written option constituted a valid claim. . The evidence in his behalf, as set forth by the answer of the magistrate, fully authorized a [694]*694judgment in’ his favor, and the judge of the superior court did not err in overruling the certiorari.

Decided June 14, 1922.

Certiorari; from Floyd superior court •— J udge Wright. October 4, 1921.

F. W. Copeland, for plaintiff in error. Porter & Mebane, contra.

Judgment affirmed.

Stephens and Hill, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI