Watkins v. Maryland Division of Corrections

Fourth Circuit

Watkins v. Maryland Division of Corrections

385 F. App'x 310

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 25, 2010·No. No. 10-6222·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jovan Watkins appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendants in Watkins’ 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) civil rights action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Watkins v. Md. Div. of Corr., No. 8:09-cv-00294-DKC, 2010 WL 234975 (D.Md. Jan. 15, 2010). We deny Watkins’ motion to appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jovan Watkins appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendants in Watkins’ 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) civil rights action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Watkins v. Md. Div. of Corr., No. 8:09-cv-00294-DKC, 2010 WL 234975 (D.Md. Jan. 15, 2010). We deny Watkins’ motion to appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Watkins v. Maryland Division of Corrections, 385 F. App'x 310 (4th Cir. 2010).

Pincite

385 F. App'x 310 (Watkins v. Maryland Division of Corrections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related