Watkins v. Martin
This text of 65 S.W. 103 (Watkins v. Martin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
William M. Watkins brought this action against Francis C. Martin upon an open account for services rendered by him to the defendant. The defendant answered and denied the account, and, among other things, pleaded the three-years’ statute of limitation in bar of plaintiff’s right to maintain the action. The defendant recovered -judgment, and the plaintiff appealed. The burden was upon the plaintiff to show that his action was
not barred by the statute of limitations. Leigh v. Evans, 64 Ark. 26; McNeil v. Garland, 27 Ark. 343; Carnall v. Clark, ib. 500; Railway v. Shocraft, 53 Ark. 96. He has utterly failed to do so.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
65 S.W. 103, 69 Ark. 311, 1901 Ark. LEXIS 125, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/watkins-v-martin-ark-1901.