Watkins v. Martin

65 S.W. 103, 69 Ark. 311, 1901 Ark. LEXIS 125
Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided May 11, 1901·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinions

Battle, J.

William M. Watkins brought this action against Francis C. Martin upon an open account for services rendered by him to the defendant. The defendant answered and denied the account, and, among other things, pleaded the three-years’ statute of limitation in bar of plaintiff’s right to maintain the action. The defendant recovered -judgment, and the plaintiff appealed. The burden was upon the plaintiff to show that his action was

not barred by the statute of limitations. Leigh v. Evans, 64 Ark. 26; McNeil v. Garland, 27 Ark. 343; Carnall v. Clark, ib. 500; Railway v. Shocraft, 53 Ark. 96. He has utterly failed to do so.

Judgment affirmed.

Wood, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Watkins v. Martin, 65 S.W. 103, 69 Ark. 311, 1901 Ark. LEXIS 125 (Ark. 1901).

65 S.W. 103 (Watkins v. Martin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Southern Farmers Assn., Inc. v. Wyatt
353 S.W.2d 531 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1962)
Norm Company v. Harris
122 S.W.2d 532 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1938)
Rose v. Rose
42 S.W.2d 567 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1931)
Jernigan v. Pfeifer Brothers
5 S.W.2d 941 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1928)
Bolton v. Missouri Pacific Railroad
229 S.W. 1025 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1921)
Felker v. Boatmen's Bank
225 S.W. 306 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1920)
Culberhouse v. Hawthorne
156 S.W. 421 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1913)
Murphy v. Citizens' Bank
100 S.W. 894 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1907)
Simpson v. Brown-Desnoyers Shoe Co.
70 S.W. 305 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1902)