Watkins v. Jerman

36 Kan. 464
Supreme Court of Kansas·Decided January 15, 1887·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Valentine, J.-.

We think the court below erred. The holder of a sheriff’s deed for real estate purchased under a decree of foreclosure of a mortgage and a sale of the mortgaged premises, has a right to a writ of assistance to procure the possession of the premises purchased, as against all persons who were parties to the foreclosure suit, and all who hold under authority given by such parties after the .'commencement of such suit. (Bird v. Belz, 33 Kas. 391; Bell v. Birdsall, 19 How. Pr. 491; 2 Jones on Mortgages, §1663.)

The order of the court below overruling the motion of the plaintiff below for a writ of assistance will be reversed, and the cause remanded for further proceedings.

All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Watkins v. Jerman, 36 Kan. 464 (kan 1887).

36 Kan. 464 (Watkins v. Jerman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sutor Bros. v. Hebert
232 P. 594 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1925)
State ex rel. Flowerree v. District Court
227 P. 579 (Montana Supreme Court, 1924)
Baldwin v. McDonald
156 P. 27 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1916)
Lundstrum v. Branson
139 P. 1172 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1914)
Daggs v. Wilson
59 P. 150 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1899)
Anderson v. Thompson
20 P. 803 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1889)