Watkins v. Hammock
64 A.D.2d 667, 407 N.Y.S.2d 971, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12491
Opinion
—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter aha, to compel the respon[668] dent to set forth meaningful reasons why the petitioner was denied parole, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated June 14, 1977, which, after a hearing, dismissed the petition. Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements (see Matter of Briguglio v New York State Bd. of Parole, 24 NY2d 21; Burke v Commissioner of Parole of State of N. Y., 52 AD2d 589). Mollen, P. J., Hopkins, Titone, Shapiro and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Watkins v. Hammock, 64 A.D.2d 667, 407 N.Y.S.2d 971, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12491 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1978).
64 A.D.2d 667 (Watkins v. Hammock) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
MATTER OF BRIGUGLIO v. Bd. of Parole
246 N.E.2d 512 (New York Court of Appeals, 1969)
Burke v. Commissioner of Parole
52 A.D.2d 589 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)