Watkins v. Geren

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMay 20, 2008
Docket07-1859
StatusUnpublished

This text of Watkins v. Geren (Watkins v. Geren) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Watkins v. Geren, (4th Cir. 2008).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-1859

FELICIA G. WATKINS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

PETE GEREN, Secretary, Department of the Army,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (1:06-cv-02728-JFM)

Submitted: April 30, 2008 Decided: May 20, 2008

Before GREGORY and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jeffery C. Taylor, Michael J. Snider, Ari Taragin, SNIDER & ASSOCIATES, LLC, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Attorney, Ariana Wright Arnold, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Felicia G. Watkins appeals the district court’s orders

denying her Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(f) motion for additional discovery,

granting Defendant’s summary judgment motion on her race and gender

discrimination and retaliation claims, brought pursuant to Title

VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e

to 2000e-17 (2000), and denying her Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion

for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. See Watkins v. Geren, No. 1:06-cv-02728-JFM

(D. Md. June 19, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Definitions
42 U.S.C. § 2000e

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Watkins v. Geren, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/watkins-v-geren-ca4-2008.