Watkins v. Feinberg

30 A.2d 27, 129 N.J.L. 386, 1943 N.J. LEXIS 188
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedJanuary 22, 1943
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 30 A.2d 27 (Watkins v. Feinberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Watkins v. Feinberg, 30 A.2d 27, 129 N.J.L. 386, 1943 N.J. LEXIS 188 (N.J. 1943).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Heher in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance —The Chancellor, Parker, Bodine, Donges, Perskie, Porter, Colie, Dear, Wells, Rafferty, Hague, Thompson, JJ. 12.

For reversal —None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Keene v. Willis
260 A.2d 371 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
30 A.2d 27, 129 N.J.L. 386, 1943 N.J. LEXIS 188, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/watkins-v-feinberg-nj-1943.