Watkins v. Edgar

Missouri Court of Appeals

Watkins v. Edgar

68 S.W. 87, 94 Mo. App. 285, 1902 Mo. App. LEXIS 559

DecidedApril 29, 1902

StatusPublished

This text of 68 S.W. 87 (Watkins v. Edgar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Watkins v. Edgar, 68 S.W. 87, 94 Mo. App. 285, 1902 Mo. App. LEXIS 559 (Mo. Ct. App. 1902).

Pincite

Opinion

BLAND, P. J.

The validity of the adoption of the amendment of the Constitution, authorizing nine jurors to find a verdict in a civil suit, was raised by the appellant in the trial court and a ruling of that court adversely to his contention was made, the verdict having been rendered by nine of the twelve jurors.

We find a constitutional question is raised by appellant, which was decided adversely to him; therefore, we transfer the ease to the Supreme Court for its disposition.

Barclay, and Goode, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BLAND, P. J.

The validity of the adoption of the amendment of the Constitution, authorizing nine jurors to find a verdict in a civil suit, was raised by the appellant in the trial court and a ruling of that court adversely to his contention was made, the verdict having been rendered by nine of the twelve jurors.

We find a constitutional question is raised by appellant, which was decided adversely to him; therefore, we transfer the ease to the Supreme Court for its disposition.

Barclay, and Goode, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

68 S.W. 87, 94 Mo. App. 285, 1902 Mo. App. LEXIS 559, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/watkins-v-edgar-moctapp-1902.