Watkins v. Cullen

677 F. App'x 124
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 22, 2017
DocketNo. 16-7388
StatusPublished

This text of 677 F. App'x 124 (Watkins v. Cullen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Watkins v. Cullen, 677 F. App'x 124 (4th Cir. 2017).

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Elia T. Watkins seeks to appeal the district court’s order warning him that his complaint is subject to dismissal without [125]*125prejudice. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order Watkins seeks to appeal is neither final nor otherwise appealable. See Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-47, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949); Catlin v. United States, 324 U.S. 229, 233-34, 65 S.Ct. 631, 89 L.Ed. 911 (1945).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Catlin v. United States
324 U.S. 229 (Supreme Court, 1945)
Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.
337 U.S. 541 (Supreme Court, 1949)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
677 F. App'x 124, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/watkins-v-cullen-ca4-2017.