Watkins v. Collins

853 N.E.2d 672, 110 Ohio St. 3d 1477
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided September 7, 2006·No. 2006-1634·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

In Habeas Corpus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus and was considered in a manner prescribed by law. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that the writ is allowed. Allowing the writ means only that a return is ordered.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondent shall file a return of writ within three days of service of the petition, and petitioners may file a response within three days after the return is filed. Respondent shall provide a copy of the return to petitioners’ counsel on the same date that the return is filed. Petitioners’ physical presence before the court is not required.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Watkins v. Collins, 853 N.E.2d 672, 110 Ohio St. 3d 1477 (Ohio 2006).

853 N.E.2d 672 (Watkins v. Collins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State ex rel. Bradford v. Bowen
2023 Ohio 1105 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2023)
State v. Fitzgerald, Unpublished Decision (12-14-2006)
2006 Ohio 6575 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2006)
Watkins v. Collins
111 Ohio St. 3d 425 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2006)