Watkins v. Arms

6 A. 92, 64 N.H. 99
CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire
DecidedJune 5, 1886
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 6 A. 92 (Watkins v. Arms) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Watkins v. Arms, 6 A. 92, 64 N.H. 99 (N.H. 1886).

Opinion

Carpenter, J.

The plaintiff’s rights are not affected by the insolvency proceedings in Vermont. Perley v. Mason, 64 N. H. 6 ; Carbee v. Mason, 64 N. H. 10, and cases cited.

The conveyance of the land and bank stock to the defendant was absolute in terms, but was in fact a mere security. Watkins, upon payment of the mortgage debt was entitled to a reconveyance. This is a secret trust, and fraudulent in law, though no fraud was in fact intended. Stratton v. Putney, 63 N. H. 577, and cases cited.

Decree for the plaintiff.

Allen, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Belis v. Belis
152 A. 917 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1931)
Corning v. Records
46 A. 462 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1898)
Quimby v. Williams
41 A. 862 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1893)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 A. 92, 64 N.H. 99, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/watkins-v-arms-nh-1886.