Watkins' Adm'r v. Pemberton

47 N.C. 174
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJune 5, 1855
StatusPublished

This text of 47 N.C. 174 (Watkins' Adm'r v. Pemberton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Watkins' Adm'r v. Pemberton, 47 N.C. 174 (N.C. 1855).

Opinion

Battle, J.

The only question presented by the record is, whether an appeal to the superior court could be taken from the order of the county court, and we are clearly of opinion that it could. Those of the next of kin of the plaintiff’s intestate who preferred a division of the slaves to a sale of them for partition, by the administrator, were certainly interested in the order of sale made by the county court. Being so, and being dissatisfied with it, they had a right to appeal from it by the express words of the first section of the 4th chapter of the Eevised Statutes concerning appeals and proceedings in the nature of Appeals.”

The present is the same in principle as the case of Murphrey v. Wood, ante 63, in which we held, at the last term, that the right of appeal was given.

The order of the superior court, reversing that of the county court, is affirmed ; and this opinion must be certified as the law directs.

Pee OueiaM. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
47 N.C. 174, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/watkins-admr-v-pemberton-nc-1855.