Watervliet Bank v. Clark

New York Supreme Court

Watervliet Bank v. Clark

1 How. Pr. 144

DecidedApril 15, 1845

StatusPublished

This text of 1 How. Pr. 144 (Watervliet Bank v. Clark) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Watervliet Bank v. Clark, 1 How. Pr. 144 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1845).

Pincite

Opinion

Bronson, Chief Justice.

This is one of those cases in which both of the parties think themselves right on a question of fact, and where it is impossible on the papers presented to say with any great degree of certainty, which is in the wrong. The defendant swears to merits, and on the whole I think the report of the referee and subsequent proceedings on the part of the plaintiffs should be set aside, without costs to either party.

Rule accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bronson, Chief Justice.

This is one of those cases in which both of the parties think themselves right on a question of fact, and where it is impossible on the papers presented to say with any great degree of certainty, which is in the wrong. The defendant swears to merits, and on the whole I think the report of the referee and subsequent proceedings on the part of the plaintiffs should be set aside, without costs to either party.

Rule accordingly.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 How. Pr. 144, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/watervliet-bank-v-clark-nysupct-1845.