Watertown Paper Co. v. West

3 A.D. 451, 38 N.Y.S. 229
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 1, 1896·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

It appears by the affidavit upon which this motion was made that this defendant has not answered or demurred or otherwise moved in reference to the complaint since the same was served upon him. There is no allegation in the moving papers that a hill of particulars is necessary to enable the defendant to prepare his answer; and it is quite evident that it is not, as he can deny, either expressly or upon information and belief, the allegations contained in the complaint. We think, therefore, that this motion was prematurely made, and that at this stage of the action the facts necessary to be alleged and proved were not before the court to justify the granting of a bill of particulars.

The order should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion denied, with ten dollars costs.

Present — Van Brunt, P. J., Barrett, Rumsey, O’Brien and Ingraham, JJ.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Watertown Paper Co. v. West, 3 A.D. 451, 38 N.Y.S. 229 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1896).

3 A.D. 451 (Watertown Paper Co. v. West) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Moot v. Moot
86 Misc. 495 (New York Supreme Court, 1914)
Updike v. Mace
156 A.D. 381 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1913)
Bailey v. Mayer
56 Misc. 331 (New York Supreme Court, 1907)
Saalfield v. Cutting
25 Misc. 661 (New York Supreme Court, 1898)
McClellan v. Duncombe
26 A.D. 353 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1898)
American Credit Indemnity Co. v. Bondy
17 A.D. 328 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1897)
Haggerty v. Ryan
17 Misc. 277 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1896)