Waterston v. Zuckerman
This text of 124 A.D.2d 725 (Waterston v. Zuckerman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[726]*726Based upon the financial circumstances of the parties, we find that the award of temporary counsel fees of $1,500, temporary maintenance of $150 per week and temporary child support of $100 per week was not an abuse of discretion. "We have repeatedly stated that the remedy for an award of temporary maintenance claimed to be unsatisfactory is a speedy trial at which a more detailed examination of the financial situation of the parties may be made” (Sassano v Sassano, 112 AD2d 1034, 1035; Rossman v Rossman, 91 AD2d 1036; Marcus v Marcus, 91 AD2d 991; Jorgensen v Jorgensen, 86 AD2d 861; Woram v Gilliam, 78 AD2d 796; Hyman v Hyman, 56 AD2d 337, 338). Thompson, J. P., Brown, Eiber and Spatt, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
124 A.D.2d 725, 507 N.Y.S.2d 1010, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 62030, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/waterston-v-zuckerman-nyappdiv-1986.