Waterson v. Wilson
This text of 1 Grant 74 (Waterson v. Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— The great obstacle in the plaintiff’s way, was that the deed under which the defendant claimed was made seven years before the debt, which was the foundation of the sheriff’s sale, was contracted.
To render a voluntary conveyance void as to subsequent creditors, it must appear that it was made in contemplation of future indebtedness, and until this was shown the plaintiff could not call upon the defendant to prove the consideration for the conveyance.
There was no evidence in the ease tending to establish the allegation that the deed to Wilson- was intended as a mortgage, and hence the answer of the court to the effect of the deed, if it was so intended, was a mere abstraction, and cannot be assigned for error. . '
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Grant 74, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/waterson-v-wilson-pa-1854.