Waterside Associates, LLC v. Tax Commissioner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Waterside Associates, LLC v. Tax Commissioner

23 A.D.3d 392, 803 N.Y.S.2d 441

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 7, 2005

StatusPublished

This text of 23 A.D.3d 392 (Waterside Associates, LLC v. Tax Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Waterside Associates, LLC v. Tax Commissioner, 23 A.D.3d 392, 803 N.Y.S.2d 441 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding, inter alia, pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondents dated February 27, 2004, finding the petitioners liable for interest on real estate taxes for the tax years July 1, 1992, through June 30, 2001, the petitioners appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Giacobbe, J.), dated January 5, 2005, which dismissed the proceeding as time-barred.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The instant proceeding was properly dismissed as time-barred (see CPLR 217; Matter of Adventist Home v Board of Assessors of Town of Livingston, 83 NY2d 878 [1994]; Matter of Castroll v Incorporated Vil. of Head of Harbor, 2 AD3d 443 [2003]). H. Miller, J.P., Santucci, Goldstein and Dillon, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding, inter alia, pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondents dated February 27, 2004, finding the petitioners liable for interest on real estate taxes for the tax years July 1, 1992, through June 30, 2001, the petitioners appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Giacobbe, J.), dated January 5, 2005, which dismissed the proceeding as time-barred.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The instant proceeding was properly dismissed as time-barred (see CPLR 217; Matter of Adventist Home v Board of Assessors of Town of Livingston, 83 NY2d 878 [1994]; Matter of Castroll v Incorporated Vil. of Head of Harbor, 2 AD3d 443 [2003]). H. Miller, J.P., Santucci, Goldstein and Dillon, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

23 A.D.3d 392, 803 N.Y.S.2d 441, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/waterside-associates-llc-v-tax-commissioner-nyappdiv-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack