Waters v. State

123 S.E. 722, 32 Ga. App. 416
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided June 10, 1924·No. 15500·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

The motion for a new trial contains the general grounds only. There is some evidence to support the verdict, and “whenever there is any evidence, however slight, to support a verdict which has been approved by the trial judge, this court is absolutely without authority to control the judgment of the trial court/’’ Bradham v. State, 21 Ga. App. 510 (94 S. E. 618).

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and-Lulce, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Waters v. State, 123 S.E. 722, 32 Ga. App. 416 (Ga. Ct. App. 1924).

123 S.E. 722 (Waters v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Vaughn, James v. Fairley
44 S.E.2d 461 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1947)