Waters v. State
650 So. 2d 232, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 1833, 1995 WL 73576
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 24, 1995
DocketNo. 94-104
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 650 So. 2d 232 (Waters v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Waters v. State, 650 So. 2d 232, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 1833, 1995 WL 73576 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).
Opinion
We affirm the judgment and sentence imposed following revocation of Appellant’s probation. Eanes v. State, 648 So.2d 174 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994) (on motion for certification); Bragg v. State, 644 So.2d 586 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994). We certify the following as a question of great public importance:
MUST A TRIAL COURT, UPON REVOCATION OF PROBATION FOLLOWING COMPLETION OF COMMUNITY CONTROL, CREDIT TIME PREVIOUSLY SERVED ON PROBATION AND COMMUNITY CONTROL TO ANY NEWLY IMPOSED TERM OF IMPRISONMENT AND PROBATION FOR THE SAME OFFENSE, SO THAT THE TOTAL PERIOD OF COMMUNITY CONTROL, PROBATION, AND IMPRISONMENT ALREADY SERVED AND TO BE SERVED DOES NOT EXCEED THE STATUTORY MAXIMUM FOR A SINGLE OFFENSE?
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Waters v. State
662 So. 2d 332 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1995)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
650 So. 2d 232, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 1833, 1995 WL 73576, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/waters-v-state-fladistctapp-1995.