Waters v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Waters v. State

145 So. 926, 25 Ala. App. 694

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 31, 1933

Docket8 Div. 587.

StatusPublished

This text of 145 So. 926 (Waters v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Waters v. State, 145 So. 926, 25 Ala. App. 694 (Ala. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

The appellant, in the court below, was tried upon an indictment, duly preferred, for the offense of robbery, in that he feloniously took an automatic pistol of the value of $25 from the person of one M. C. Patrick, against his will, by violence to his person, or by putting him in such fear as unwillingly to part with the same, etc. He was convicted as charged, and the jury fixed his punishment at imprisonment for ten years. The court, in accordance with the verdict of the jury, duly sentenced him to imprisonment in the penitentiary for ten years. From the judgment of conviction this appeal was taken.

On this appeal .the regularity of the record upon which the appeal is rested is the only question for consideration. The record being regular in all things, the judgment of conviction appealed from is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRICKEN, P. J.

The appellant, in the court below, was tried upon an indictment, duly preferred, for the offense of robbery, in that he feloniously took an automatic pistol of the value of $25 from the person of one M. C. Patrick, against his will, by violence to his person, or by putting him in such fear as unwillingly to part with the same, etc. He was convicted as charged, and the jury fixed his punishment at imprisonment for ten years. The court, in accordance with the verdict of the jury, duly sentenced him to imprisonment in the penitentiary for ten years. From the judgment of conviction this appeal was taken.

On this appeal .the regularity of the record upon which the appeal is rested is the only question for consideration. The record being regular in all things, the judgment of conviction appealed from is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

145 So. 926, 25 Ala. App. 694, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/waters-v-state-alactapp-1933.