Waters v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
Opinion
In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS Filed: November 28, 2016
************************* RICHARD WATERS, * * No. 16-1084v Petitioner, * v. * UNPUBLISHED * SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Notice of Voluntary Dismissal; AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Vaccine Rule 21(a). * Respondent. * * *************************
ORDER CONCLUDING PROCEEDINGS1
Dorsey, Chief Special Master:
On November 21, 2016, petitioner filed a notice of voluntary dismissal, requesting that this claim be dismissed pursuant to Vaccine Rule 21(a). In accordance with this rule, this case is hereby dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is instructed that judgment shall not enter in the instant case pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Nora Beth Dorsey Nora Beth Dorsey Chief Special Master
1 Because this unpublished order contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I intend to post it to the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with the E- Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2006)). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to delete medical or other information, that satisfies the criteria in § 300aa- 12(d)(4)(B). Further, consistent with the rule requirement, a motion for redaction must include a proposed redacted decision. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within the requirements of that provision, I will delete such material from public access.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Waters v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Waters v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.