Waters v. Rossotti

22 F. App'x 307
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedDecember 27, 2001
Docket01-1941
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 22 F. App'x 307 (Waters v. Rossotti) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Waters v. Rossotti, 22 F. App'x 307 (4th Cir. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Charles Ray Waters, Sr., appeals from the district court’s order dismissing his civil action against the Commissioner of Internal Revenue. Our review of the record and the district court’s opinion adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Waters’ motion to proceed in forma pauperis and his “Ex Parte Motion” and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Waters v. Rossotti No. CA-00-1241-1 (M.D.N.C. filed May 23, 2001 & entered May 24, 2001). We dispense with oral argument *308 because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Waters v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
537 U.S. 939 (Supreme Court, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
22 F. App'x 307, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/waters-v-rossotti-ca4-2001.