Waters v. Rossotti

Fourth Circuit

Waters v. Rossotti

22 F. App'x 307

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 27, 2001·No. 01-1941·Unpublished·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Charles Ray Waters, Sr., appeals from the district court’s order dismissing his civil action against the Commissioner of Internal Revenue. Our review of the record and the district court’s opinion adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Waters’ motion to proceed in forma pauperis and his “Ex Parte Motion” and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Waters v. Rossotti No. CA-00-1241-1 (M.D.N.C. filed May 23, 2001 & entered May 24, 2001). We dispense with oral argument *308 because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Charles Ray Waters, Sr., appeals from the district court’s order dismissing his civil action against the Commissioner of Internal Revenue. Our review of the record and the district court’s opinion adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Waters’ motion to proceed in forma pauperis and his “Ex Parte Motion” and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Waters v. Rossotti No. CA-00-1241-1 (M.D.N.C. filed May 23, 2001 & entered May 24, 2001). We dispense with oral argument *308 because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Waters v. Rossotti, 22 F. App'x 307 (4th Cir. 2001).

Pincite

22 F. App'x 307 (Waters v. Rossotti) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related