Waters v. Creagh
Opinion
Opinion of the Court delivered by
When there are several executors, some of whom die before the administration is completed, the interest devolves exclusively on the last survivor and his executors, if any. Toller, 44. But it is said, that the note being payable to Creagh and Bayard, they had a right, in their individual-characters, to bring an action on it. Admitting that the payees had a discretion to sue, either in their private or representative capacity, yet after the death of one, the action must be by the survivor alone, and the executor or administrator of the deceased cannot be joined, but must seek his [129] remedy against the survivor, for the share of the deceased. 1st Chitty’s Pleadings, 10; and see 3d. Munford, 513. 1st Wash. 257.
It is therefore evident, that whether the debt be received as due to the payees in their private or representative characters, the action should have been in the name of the survivor alone.
It is the unanimous opinion of the Court that the judgment be reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
1 Minor 128 (Waters v. Creagh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.