Waters v. Collot

2 U.S. 247, 1 L. Ed. 367, 2 Dall. 247, 1796 U.S. LEXIS 421
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided September 1, 1796·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

By the Court.

We think, that there is sufficient cause shewn, for holding the defendant to bail. But, it must not be understood, that, by this decision, we give any countenance to an opinion, that he is ultimately liable. It is a question of great delicacy, in which our regard for the rights of a fellow-citizen, and our respect for the sovereignty of a foreign nation, are equally involved. When, therefore, the subject is judicially investigated, we shall be governed, as well by the law of nations, as by our municipal law. *

*

* The defendant com.;la:ned of his arrett to the government of France., by which it was made a matter of public complaint againft the Federal government; and, eventually, the plaintiff difcontun¿ed his action.’

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Waters v. Collot, 2 U.S. 247, 1 L. Ed. 367, 2 Dall. 247, 1796 U.S. LEXIS 421 (1796).

2 U.S. 247 (Waters v. Collot) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related