Waters Mark v. Brevard Cty
This text of Waters Mark v. Brevard Cty (Waters Mark v. Brevard Cty) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
WATERS MARK DEVELOPMENT ENTERPRISES, LC,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D16-1302
BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA,
Appellee.
________________________________/
Opinion filed October 20, 2017
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Brevard County, George B. Turner, Judge.
John H. Pelzer, Glenn N. Smith, and Elizabeth Adler, of Greenspoon Marder, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for Appellant.
Dale A. Scott and Michael J. Roper, of Bell & Roper, P.A., Orlando, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
We conclude that the applicable statute of limitations did not commence to run until
Appellee denied Appellant’s application for site plan approval on October 31, 2012. See
M & H Profit, Inc. v. City of Panama City, 28 So. 3d 71 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009). We
distinguish Citrus County v. Halls River Development, Inc., 8 So. 3d 413 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009). In that case, the challenged government act involved the reclassification of the
land use category on a particular piece of property.
Accordingly, we reverse and remand this cause for further proceedings. In doing
so, we express no view on the merits of the claim.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
TORPY, EDWARDS and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Waters Mark v. Brevard Cty, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/waters-mark-v-brevard-cty-fladistctapp-2017.