Waters, Arthur Jr. AKA Waters, Arnty AKA Watson, Arnty Jr.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Waters, Arthur Jr. AKA Waters, Arnty AKA Watson, Arnty Jr.

DecidedDecember 14, 2011

DocketWR-29,499-06

StatusPublished

This text of Waters, Arthur Jr. AKA Waters, Arnty AKA Watson, Arnty Jr. (Waters, Arthur Jr. AKA Waters, Arnty AKA Watson, Arnty Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Waters, Arthur Jr. AKA Waters, Arnty AKA Watson, Arnty Jr., (Tex. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-29,499-06

ARTHUR WATERS, JR. AKA ARNTY WATSON, JR., Relator

v.

SMITH COUNTY DISTRICT CLERK, Respondent

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS

CAUSE NO. 4-89-110 IN THE 114^TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

FROM SMITH COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Relator has filed a motion for leave to file a writ of mandamus pursuant to the original jurisdiction of this Court. In it, he contends that the District Clerk of Smith County is not providing him with copies of documents filed relating to his habeas application, which is currently pending on remand in the 114^th Judicial District Court.

In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. The respondent, the District Clerk of Smith County, is ordered to file a response stating whether the State has filed any answer, motion, or other pleading relating to Relator's habeas application, and whether the trial court has issued any orders relating to the habeas application. If any such documents have been filed or issued, the respondent shall state whether copies have been provided to Relator, as required by Texas Code of Criminal Procedure article 11.07 §7, and if not, why not.

This application for leave to file a writ of mandamus shall be held in abeyance until the respondent has submitted the appropriate response. Such response shall be submitted within 30 days of the date of this order.

Filed: December 14, 2011

Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-29,499-06

ARTHUR WATERS, JR. AKA ARNTY WATSON, JR., Relator

v.

SMITH COUNTY DISTRICT CLERK, Respondent

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS

CAUSE NO. 4-89-110 IN THE 114^TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

FROM SMITH COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Relator has filed a motion for leave to file a writ of mandamus pursuant to the original jurisdiction of this Court. In it, he contends that the District Clerk of Smith County is not providing him with copies of documents filed relating to his habeas application, which is currently pending on remand in the 114^th Judicial District Court.

In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. The respondent, the District Clerk of Smith County, is ordered to file a response stating whether the State has filed any answer, motion, or other pleading relating to Relator's habeas application, and whether the trial court has issued any orders relating to the habeas application. If any such documents have been filed or issued, the respondent shall state whether copies have been provided to Relator, as required by Texas Code of Criminal Procedure article 11.07 §7, and if not, why not.

This application for leave to file a writ of mandamus shall be held in abeyance until the respondent has submitted the appropriate response. Such response shall be submitted within 30 days of the date of this order.

Filed: December 14, 2011

Do not publish

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Waters, Arthur Jr. AKA Waters, Arnty AKA Watson, Arnty Jr., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/waters-arthur-jr-aka-waters-arnty-aka-watson-arnty-texcrimapp-2011.